In the case of Roe v. Wade, what answer explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted? (1 point)
The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual
An individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marrtage.
The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution
Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment.
The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
The correct answer is:
The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
The correct answer is: The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
To arrive at this answer, you would need to consider the legal background of the case and the reasoning used by the Supreme Court in their decision. Understanding how to approach this question requires knowledge of the case and an understanding of the relevant constitutional principles.
Roe v. Wade was a landmark Supreme Court case in 1973 that legalized abortion in the United States. The court reasoned that the right to privacy, which is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but is inferred from the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, protected a woman's right to choose whether or not to have an abortion. This right to privacy, which encompasses personal decisions regarding family, marriage, and reproductive choices, warranted judicial review at the Supreme Court level.
Therefore, the answer that explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted in the case of Roe v. Wade is that the right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.