In the case of Roe v. Wade, what answer explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted?(1 point)
Responses
An individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marriage.
An individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marriage.
Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment.
The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
The correct answer is: The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
The correct answer is: The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
To arrive at this answer, one should be familiar with the case of Roe v. Wade. It is a landmark Supreme Court case from 1973 that established the constitutional right to abortion. In this case, the Court ruled that a woman has the right to choose to have an abortion, based on the right to privacy implied in the Fourteenth Amendment.
To understand why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted, we need to consider the process of judicial review itself. Judicial review is the power of the courts to review and potentially invalidate laws or government actions that are deemed unconstitutional. It is one of the core functions of the judicial branch of government.
In the case of Roe v. Wade, the issue at hand was whether or not a state law that banned abortions except to save the life of the mother violated the Constitution. The Court examined the Fourteenth Amendment, which contains the Due Process Clause, and concluded that it included a right to privacy that protected a woman's decision to have an abortion.
Therefore, the answer stating that the right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual is the most accurate explanation for why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted in the case of Roe v. Wade.