In the case of Roe v. Wade, what answer explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted?(1 point) Responses The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. An individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marriage. An individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marriage. Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment. Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment. The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.

The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.

The answer that explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted in the case of Roe v. Wade is: The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.

The correct answer that explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted in the case of Roe v. Wade is: The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.

To arrive at this answer, we need to understand the background of the case. Roe v. Wade was a landmark Supreme Court case in 1973 that established the constitutional right to access abortion. The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, specifically the right to privacy.

To get this answer, you would need to know about the Fourteenth Amendment and its protections, including the right to privacy. The Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees individuals the right to privacy, which has been established through previous court cases. In Roe v. Wade, the court determined that a woman's decision to have an abortion falls within this right to privacy. Therefore, judicial review by the Supreme Court was warranted in order to interpret and uphold the constitutionality of the right to privacy in relation to abortion.