In the case of Roe v. Wade, what answer explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted? (1 point)
• An individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marriage.
• The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
• Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment.
• The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
The correct answer is: The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
The answer that explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted in the case of Roe v. Wade is: The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
To determine why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted in the case of Roe v. Wade, we need to analyze the options provided.
The first option suggests that an individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marriage. However, this option does not directly address the issue at hand, which is the right to choose regarding abortion. Therefore, this option is not the answer.
The second option states that the right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual. The right to privacy is a fundamental right that has been established by the Supreme Court in previous cases. In Roe v. Wade, the Court recognized that a woman's decision to have an abortion falls within the realm of privacy and personal autonomy. Therefore, this option is a valid explanation for why judicial review was warranted in this case.
The third option suggests that individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment. While this statement is true, it is not relevant to the specific context of Roe v. Wade, which deals with abortion rights. Hence, this option is not the answer.
The fourth option claims that the right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. This statement is incorrect. In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court recognized that a woman's decision to have an abortion is protected under the right to privacy, which is derived from the Fourteenth Amendment. Therefore, this option is not the answer.
In conclusion, the second option, which states that the right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual, provides the valid explanation for why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted in the case of Roe v. Wade.