n the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, how did the process of judicial review allow the Supreme Court to decide on the case?(1 point)
Responses
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the rule of law protected individuals from segregation in schools.
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the rule of law protected individuals from segregation in schools.
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.
The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, citing the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, citing the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, stating that in education they are allowed to segregate.
The correct answer is:
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.
The correct answer is:
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.
In the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the process of judicial review allowed the Supreme Court to decide on the case by reviewing the constitutionality of the segregation laws in public schools. Judicial review is the power of the courts to determine whether a law or government action is consistent with the Constitution.
In this particular case, the Supreme Court reviewed the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which guarantees equal protection under the law. By examining this amendment, the Court assessed whether the segregation of schools based on race violated the equal protection clause.
The ruling in Brown v. Board of Education was found in favor of the plaintiff, and it had significant implications for education and civil rights in the United States. The Court ruled that the concept of "separate but equal," which had been established by the earlier Plessy v. Ferguson case, was unconstitutional in the context of public education. This meant that racial segregation in schools was no longer permissible under the law.
Therefore, the correct answer is: "The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional." This ruling was a landmark decision and a major step towards desegregating public schools.