In the case of Roe v. Wade, what answer explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted?(1 point) Responses The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment. Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment. The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual. The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual. An individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marriage.
The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
The answer that explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted in the case of Roe v. Wade is: "The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual."
To understand why this answer is correct, it is important to first understand what judicial review is and how it is applied by the Supreme Court. Judicial review is the power of the courts to review the constitutionality of laws or government actions. The Supreme Court, as the highest court in the land, has the authority to exercise this power and make final decisions on constitutional issues.
In Roe v. Wade, the question at hand was whether a state law that criminalized abortion violated the constitutional rights of individuals. The Supreme Court reviewed the law and considered various constitutional arguments put forth by the plaintiffs and defendants.
The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is crucial in this case because it contains the Due Process Clause, which guarantees certain fundamental rights to individuals. The Supreme Court, in its decision, held that the right to privacy, although not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, is encompassed within the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Court reasoned that the right to privacy includes a woman's decision to have an abortion. It recognized that this decision falls within the realm of personal autonomy and intimate choices that are protected by the Due Process Clause.
Therefore, the answer that correctly explains why judicial review was warranted is that the right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.