Explain the similarities and differences between a milanesa and a milanesa napolitana. Write your answer in English
A milanesa and a milanesa napolitana are both popular breaded meat dishes that originated in Argentina. The main similarity between them is the cooking method, which involves coating a thin slice of meat in breadcrumbs and then frying it until it becomes crispy and golden brown. However, there are significant differences between the two dishes.
The main difference lies in the additional ingredients and toppings used in the milanesa napolitana. In a traditional milanesa, the fried breaded meat is usually served as-is or accompanied by a sauce or garnish. On the other hand, a milanesa napolitana is topped with various additional ingredients such as ham, cheese, tomato sauce, and sometimes even sliced tomatoes and sliced onions. These toppings are placed on top of the cooked milanesa and then baked in the oven until the cheese melts and the dish is heated through.
Another noteworthy difference is the origin of the dishes. While both dishes are commonly associated with Argentine cuisine, the milanesa is said to have been inspired by the Wiener Schnitzel, a traditional Austrian dish. It is believed that Italian immigrants in Argentina adapted the recipe to the meat available in the country, resulting in the creation of milanesa. The milanesa napolitana, on the other hand, takes its name from the city of Naples in Italy. The addition of ingredients such as tomato sauce and cheese reflects the influence of Italian cuisine on this particular variant.
In summary, the similarities between a milanesa and a milanesa napolitana lie in their cooking method of breading and frying meat. However, while a milanesa is typically served as a standalone breaded meat dish, the milanesa napolitana includes additional toppings such as ham, cheese, and tomato sauce, which are then baked. Additionally, the milanesa has its roots in Austrian cuisine, while the milanesa napolitana draws from Italian culinary influences.