1. What is a reason that the Missouri compromise did not have lasting effects
2. Which of the following laws would the free-soil party have supported
3. In what way did uncle tom’s cabin change the attitude of the northerners about slavery?
4. What does the author mean in saying that popular sovereignty “ undermined the missouri compromise”?
If you have the rest of the answer please list those ones to, i just got tired of writing, PLEASE HELP MEEEE
1. One reason the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects is that it was eventually nullified by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This act created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, and allowed for popular sovereignty, which meant that the residents of these territories could decide for themselves whether to allow slavery. This undermined the previously established balance between free and slave states.
2. The Free-Soil Party would have supported the Wilmot Proviso. The Wilmot Proviso was a proposed law that aimed to ban slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico as a result of the Mexican-American War. The Free-Soil Party was focused on preventing the expansion of slavery into new territories.
3. Uncle Tom's Cabin, written by Harriet Beecher Stowe, changed the attitude of Northerners about slavery by exposing the harsh realities of slavery and its impact on individuals. The book depicted the cruelty and inhumanity of slavery, and it humanized enslaved people to Northern readers. It contributed to the growing sentiment against slavery and helped to galvanize the abolitionist movement.
4. When the author states that popular sovereignty "undermined the Missouri Compromise," they are referring to the fact that the principle of popular sovereignty, which allowed for the residents of a territory to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery, directly contradicted the terms of the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise had established a boundary between slave and free states, and popular sovereignty effectively allowed for the potential expansion of slavery into areas previously designated as free. This undermined the delicate balance achieved by the Missouri Compromise and contributed to the growing tensions between North and South over the issue of slavery.
1. One reason why the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects is because it only temporarily resolved the issue of slavery in new territories. It established a boundary line, with slavery being allowed in Missouri as a slave state and prohibited north of the 36°30' parallel line, except for Missouri's southern border. However, this compromise was eventually deemed unconstitutional by the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision in 1857, which ruled that Congress did not have the power to regulate slavery in the territories. This decision undermined the Missouri Compromise and contributed to the intensification of tensions between the North and South, eventually leading to the American Civil War.
2. The Free Soil Party was a political party that emerged in the mid-19th century with the goal of opposing the expansion of slavery into new territories. They believed that the territories should be reserved for free labor, as opposed to slave labor. As such, they would have supported laws that aimed to limit or ban the spread of slavery into these territories. Specifically, they would have supported the Wilmot Proviso, which sought to prohibit slavery in any territory acquired as a result of the Mexican-American War.
3. Uncle Tom's Cabin, written by Harriet Beecher Stowe and published in 1852, had a significant impact on the attitude of Northerners towards slavery. The novel depicted the harsh realities of slavery, showing the inhumane treatment of enslaved individuals and the destructive effects it had on families. It humanized the issue of slavery for many readers and played a crucial role in shaping public opinion.
Uncle Tom's Cabin evoked strong emotional responses from readers, particularly in the North. It created empathy and outrage towards the institution of slavery, leading many Northerners to question its morality and advocate for abolition. The novel helped galvanize support for the abolitionist movement and fuel the growing anti-slavery sentiment in the Northern states.
4. The author's statement that popular sovereignty "undermined the Missouri Compromise" refers to the idea that popular sovereignty, the concept that the settlers of a territory would decide the status of slavery through voting, nullified the original compromise. Under the Missouri Compromise, slavery was either prohibited or allowed based on geographical lines, as established by Congress. However, with the introduction of popular sovereignty, such as in the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, the decision on whether or not to allow slavery was given to the residents of the territories themselves. This overturned the previous boundary lines set by the Missouri Compromise and opened up the possibility for slavery to spread into areas where it had previously been restricted, essentially undermining the original intention of the compromise.
1. The Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects because it was eventually overturned by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision.
2. The free-soil party would have supported laws that prohibited slavery in the western territories of the United States.
3. Uncle Tom's Cabin changed the attitude of northerners about slavery by showing the harsh realities of the institution and the suffering of enslaved people. It also helped to galvanize the abolitionist movement.
4. The author means that popular sovereignty, which allowed the people of a territory to decide whether or not to allow slavery, undermined the Missouri Compromise by allowing slavery to spread into territories that had previously been off-limits to it.