What is a reason that the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects?

That's the first question.
Here are the answers for the quiz 1-9. 10 you gotta do yourself.
1. it only applied to the lands of louisiana purchase

2. Wilmot Proviso

3. They began to view it as a moral problem

4. it reopened debate over the border between free and slave states

5. Wilmot Proviso

6. Naval blockade and seizing control of the mississippi river

7. an enslaved family is being sold at an auction

8. his cautious nature on the battlefield

9. it made slavery legal in the territories.

I can 100% guarantee these are correct. I just took the quiz and here are the correct answers.

that has nothing to do with this quiz-

While I appreciate the information you provided about the quiz answers, I'll focus on answering your initial question about a reason why the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects.

One reason is that the Missouri Compromise only addressed the issue of slavery in the lands acquired from the Louisiana Purchase. As new territories were acquired and settled, the question of whether those territories would allow slavery or not arose once again. This led to renewed debates and conflicts, ultimately undermining the stability and effectiveness of the Missouri Compromise. Additionally, as tensions over slavery increased in the years following the compromise, politicians and the public began to view slavery as a moral problem rather than just a political issue, further eroding the compromises made in the Missouri Compromise.

To answer the question regarding the reason why the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects, we need to analyze the options provided in the given answers. Let's go through each option and determine its validity:

1. "It only applied to the lands of the Louisiana Purchase." This statement is accurate. The Missouri Compromise only pertained to the territories acquired from the Louisiana Purchase, which was a limited area of the United States.

2. "Wilmot Proviso." This answer is not directly related to the question at hand. The Wilmot Proviso was a proposed amendment that sought to ban slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. While it is an important historical event, it does not provide a reason why the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects.

3. "They began to view it as a moral problem." This option seems to be more of a general observation rather than a specific reason for the Missouri Compromise's lack of lasting effects. Although the moral aspect of slavery became an increasing concern, it is not directly tied to the demise of the compromise.

4. "It reopened the debate over the border between free and slave states." This statement accurately describes one of the effects of the Missouri Compromise. However, it does not directly explain why the compromise itself did not have lasting effects.

5. "Wilmot Proviso." This option repeats the same answer as option 2. Therefore, it should be disregarded.

6. "Naval blockade and seizing control of the Mississippi River." This statement refers to the military tactics implemented during the Civil War rather than a reason why the Missouri Compromise failed to have lasting effects. The compromise was established well before the outbreak of the Civil War.

7. "An enslaved family being sold at an auction." This statement seems disconnected from the question at hand and is not relevant to the reasons why the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects.

8. "His cautious nature on the battlefield." This option appears unrelated to the Missouri Compromise and does not provide any insight into why it did not have lasting effects.

9. "It made slavery legal in the territories." This answer mischaracterizes the Missouri Compromise. In fact, the compromise imposed restrictions and regulations on the expansion of slavery in certain areas.

Based on the analysis, it appears that the options provided do not sufficiently explain why the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects. Therefore, it is necessary to engage in further research or seek additional information to accurately answer the question.

10. The Kansas-Nebraska Act