what is the reason that the Missouri compromise did not have lasting effects
A.it only applied to the lands of the Louis purchases
B. it only apply to the lands of the Mexican CESSION C.it relied on popular SOVEREIDNT
D. It limited the number of states that could be admitted per year
The Missouri Compromise was an agreement passed by Congress in 1820 to maintain a balance of power between slave and free states in the United States. However, despite its initial impact, the Missouri Compromise ultimately failed to have lasting effects due to several reasons:
1. The Compromise's provisions were temporary: The Missouri Compromise was intended to address the admission of new states to the Union. It established a line at 36°30' north latitude, where slavery would be prohibited north of this line in the Louisiana Territory, except within the boundaries of Missouri. However, this agreement was only a temporary solution and did not address the long-term issue of slavery.
2. The Compromise disregarded the issue of popular sovereignty: The Missouri Compromise did not take into account the concept of popular sovereignty, which allowed the residents of a region or state to decide whether to permit slavery. The Compromise's one-size-fits-all approach did not consider the differing opinions and circumstances of each state.
3. The Compromise was rendered null by subsequent events: The Missouri Compromise was undermined by subsequent events that intensified sectional tensions. The acquisition of new territories, particularly with the Mexican-American War and the Mexican Cession, led to renewed debates over the extension of slavery into the newly acquired lands.
4. Emergence of more divisive issues: Over time, other key issues, such as the abolitionist movement, states' rights, and the growing economic divide between the North and the South, overshadowed the Missouri Compromise. These issues brought about deeper divisions between the North and the South, making a compromise on slavery increasingly difficult.
5. The Compromise was overturned by the Kansas-Nebraska Act: The Missouri Compromise was effectively repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This act aimed to allow settlers in the Kansas and Nebraska territories to decide for themselves whether to permit slavery, effectively nullifying the Missouri Compromise's geographical restrictions.
In summary, although the Missouri Compromise attempted to address the issue of slavery, its temporary nature, failure to address popular sovereignty, subsequent events, the emergence of more divisive issues, and its ultimate repeal by the Kansas-Nebraska Act limited its long-term effectiveness.
The Missouri Compromise, passed in 1820, was an attempt to maintain a balance between free and slave states in the United States by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. It also established a line, known as the 36°30' parallel, with slavery prohibited above that line in the western territories.
While the Missouri Compromise temporarily eased tensions between the North and the South, it did not have lasting effects for several reasons:
1. The issue of slavery was deeply contentious: Slavery was a divisive issue that sparked intense sectional, economic, and moral debates. The Missouri Compromise merely postponed, rather than resolved, the issue.
2. Growing sectionalism: Over time, the interests and values of the North and the South started to diverge further. As a result, compromises like the Missouri Compromise became increasingly difficult to reach and maintain.
3. Lack of flexibility: The fixed geographic line of the 36°30' parallel imposed by the Missouri Compromise did not account for future westward expansion. As new territories were acquired, such as the Mexican Cession, the question of whether slavery should be allowed in these areas escalated tensions.
4. Emergence of abolitionist movement: The rise of abolitionist sentiment and organized movements, like the American Anti-Slavery Society, challenged the legitimacy of compromises that allowed slavery to persist. This caused even greater polarization between the North and the South.
5. Dred Scott decision: In 1857, the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, stating that Congress could not prohibit slavery in the territories. This decision invalidated the compromise and further inflamed tensions.
6. Inevitability of the Civil War: Ultimately, the underlying issues surrounding slavery could not be resolved through compromises alone. The fundamental differences between the North and the South eventually led to the outbreak of the American Civil War in 1861.
In summary, the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects due to the deeply divisive nature of slavery, the inability to address future expansion, the rise of abolitionist sentiment, the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision, and the inevitable conflict that arose from these unresolved issues.