what is a reason that the missouri compromise did not have lasting effects
1. It only applied to the louisiana purchase
2. Wilmot Provisio
3. they began to view it as a moral problem
4.It reopened debate over the border between free and slave states
5.Wilmot provisio
6. Naval blockade, seizing control of the mississpi river
7. An eslaved family is being sold at an auction
8. His cautious nature on the battle field
9.It made slavery legal in the territories
10. gotta do it urself sorry bro
aieods is 100% correct, tysm
It's %100 my g
its either
A.It only applied to the lands of the Louisiana Purchase.
B.It limited the number of states that could be admitted per year.
anyone tell me the answer.
PleaseðŸ˜
aeiods is 100%
love y'all
thanks aieods its 100% correct!!!
The Missouri Compromise was a crucial piece of legislation passed in 1820 that aimed to settle the issue of slavery expansion in the United States. While it initially calmed tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions, its long-term impact was limited due to several factors:
1. Sectional divisions: The Missouri Compromise attempted to draw a boundary between free and slave states along the 36°30' parallel line, with the exception of Missouri as a slave state. However, this division only delayed the inevitable conflict over slavery expansion, as it did not address the underlying issues or resolve the moral, political, and economic differences between the North and the South.
2. Short-term fix: The Missouri Compromise was seen as a temporary solution to the immediate crisis, rather than a comprehensive resolution. It merely postponed the issue and served as a stopgap measure, without addressing the fundamental imbalance between slave and free states. As a result, tensions continued to simmer and eventually erupted into the American Civil War.
3. Changing political landscape: Over time, the balance of power shifted within Congress and the nation. New territories emerged, such as those gained through the Mexican-American War, which further complicated the debate over slavery expansion. As political dynamics evolved and the number of states grew, maintaining the delicate balance established by the Missouri Compromise became increasingly challenging.
4. Nullified by the Kansas-Nebraska Act: The Missouri Compromise was ultimately rendered null and void by the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854. This act repealed the Compromise and proposed popular sovereignty, allowing residents of these territories to decide on the issue of slavery themselves. This move intensified sectional tensions and undermined the effectiveness and significance of the earlier Compromise.
In summary, while the Missouri Compromise attempted to address the slavery issue, its limitations as a short-term solution, changing political dynamics, and subsequent legislation contributed to its failure to have lasting effects in preventing the escalation of tensions between North and South.