How can a person disting between prejudical and nonprejudical use of rhetorical devices?
Previous answers:
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1150484982
and
Posted by Ms. Sue on Tuesday, June 20, 2006 at 9:47am.
Check these sites to help you answer your question.
(Broken Link Removed)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetoric
-----------------------
Posted by Ms. Sue on Monday, July 10, 2006 at 6:25pm.
Check this site.
http://www.jessanderson.org/doc/rr_lingo.html
----------------------
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1157494639.1157499174
Posted by PsyDAG on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 at 7:32pm.
Although prejudice is often defined as a negative attitude, we all have prejudices (biases) toward almost everything we consider. Differences occur in terms of how extreme our bias is and how much it influences our actions - including our language. If we are aware of our biases, we can often minimize them.
I will give you some sources dealing with influencing others, but, since rhetorical devices are not in my area of expertise, I will leave it to you to relate the material to them.
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/InfluenceAntecedents.html
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/InfluenceMorePrinciples.html
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/InfluenceStillMore.html
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/MeanNewsMedia.html
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/Persuasion.html
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/QuestionFrame.html
----------------------
Posted by GuruBlue, on Tuesday, January 16, 2007 at 9:19am
This site will give you the problems with prejudicial rhetoric.
http://epochewiki.pbwiki.com/PburghClarkFinalProposal
The following comes from Answers.com
First, let’s look at what the word rhetoric means.
rhet•o•ric (rtr-k)
n.
1.
a. The art or study of using language effectively and persuasively.
b. A treatise or book discussing this art.
2. Skill in using language effectively and persuasively.
3.
a. A style of speaking or writing, especially the language of a particular subject: fiery political rhetoric.
b. Language that is elaborate, pretentious, insincere, or intellectually vacuous: His offers of compromise were mere rhetoric.
4. Verbal communication; discourse.
Now, let’s say, I am a staunch anti-bubble gum lobbyist. In my rhetoric, I preach against bubble gum arguing (1) it causes bad teeth through excessive sugar, as well as continued pull of the teeth by the gum itself; (2) it is too noisy and disruptive when chewed by teenagers; (3) it is too messy and dangerous when chewed by younger children. They swallow it; they forget to take it out of their mouths at night, and it winds up in their hair and one their clothes or bed sheets.
All bubble gum should be banned! (This is an example of prejudicial rhetoric.)
A non-prejudicial use of rhetoric would be for example arguing the republican position on minimum wage increases versus the democrats position on the same subject. The republican position is that a rise in the minimum wage will be a disadvantage and burden on small business. The democrats state that it has been years since the minimum wage has risen and that low income wage earners need this rise. The truth of the matter is that there are very few jobs in the US that are paying as low as the current minimum wage.
• english - SraJMcGin, Tuesday, February 20, 2007 at 9:46pm
Thank you for using the Jiskha Homework Help Forum. First of all, any good dictionary will help you with the meanings.
rhetoric = art of oratory, or speaking well
prejudicial = leading to premature judgment or unwarranted opinion; someone has already formed an opinion
non-prejudicial = no definite opinion stated
Distinguishing between prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices can be challenging, but here are some steps you can follow to help you make that distinction.
1. Understand the concept of rhetorical devices: Familiarize yourself with different types of rhetorical devices, such as metaphors, analogies, hyperboles, and rhetorical questions. Understand their purpose, which is to persuade, provoke thought, or create a specific effect.
2. Evaluate the context: Consider the overall context in which the rhetorical device is being used. Is it in a formal speech, a written article, a casual conversation, or a social media post? The context can provide important clues about the intention and potential impact of the rhetoric.
3. Analyze the message: Examine the message conveyed by the rhetorical device. Is it promoting fairness, understanding, and respect, or is it perpetuating stereotypes, discrimination, or bias? Look for subtle cues or underlying themes that might indicate prejudicial intentions.
4. Identify the target audience: Consider who the rhetorical device is targeting. Is it intended for a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or any other characteristic? If the rhetoric aims to vilify or marginalize a particular group, it is more likely to be prejudicial.
5. Look for evidence and reasoning: Analyze the supporting evidence and reasoning used alongside the rhetoric. Is it logical, fact-based, and objective, or does it rely heavily on misinformation, stereotypes, or personal opinions? A nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices is typically backed by sound reasoning and reliable evidence.
6. Consider the impact: Assess the potential impact that the rhetoric may have on individuals or communities. Reflect on whether it is likely to promote understanding, open dialogue, and inclusivity, or if it might foster division, discrimination, or hostility.
Remember, distinguishing between prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices requires critical thinking, analysis, and an understanding of broader social and cultural contexts. It's important to remain attentive, consider multiple perspectives, and remain open to refining your judgment as you gather more information.