This question has two parts.
Explain how the Tinker v Des Moines and Texas v Johnson Supreme Court cases are related. Explain the effect(s) these cases have on US citizens.
(4 points) 150 word limit
The Tinker v Des Moines and Texas v Johnson Supreme Court cases both dealt with the issue of freedom of speech and expression. In the Tinker case, the Supreme Court ruled in 1969 that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." This decision established that students have the right to express their political beliefs in school as long as it does not disrupt the educational process.
Similarly, in the Texas v Johnson case in 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that burning the American flag as a form of political protest is protected speech under the First Amendment. This decision reinforced the idea that even controversial or unpopular forms of expression are still protected under the Constitution.
These cases have had a significant impact on US citizens by reaffirming the importance of free speech, even in challenging or uncomfortable situations. They have helped to shape the understanding and protection of individual rights to express oneself without censorship or retaliation.
make it a 7th grade answer.
The Tinker v Des Moines and Texas v Johnson Supreme Court cases both showed that people have the right to express their beliefs, even if they are controversial. In the Tinker case, students were allowed to wear armbands to protest the Vietnam War at school. In the Texas v Johnson case, a man was allowed to burn the American flag as a form of protest.
These cases mean that in the United States, people have the right to speak their mind and share their ideas, even if others might not agree. It shows that the government cannot take away our freedom of speech just because they don't like what we have to say.
These cases have made a big impact on people in the US by reminding us that we have the right to express ourselves, stand up for what we believe in, and challenge the government when we think something is wrong.