In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, how did the Justices defend the armbands students wore in public school?(1 point) Responses The armbands were small enough that no one could see them. The armbands were small enough that no one could see them. The armbands looked similar to the students’ uniforms. The armbands looked similar to the students’ uniforms. The armbands were only worn by students for 30 minutes a day. The armbands were only worn by students for 30 minutes a day. The armbands did not interfere with other students’ learning.
The Justices defended the armbands by stating that they did not cause any disruption or interference with the operation of the school. They emphasized that wearing armbands was a form of symbolic speech and expression protected by the First Amendment, and the students had the right to peacefully express their opinions on the Vietnam War.
