In the case of rovers's weight, what answer explains? Why traditionally view at the supreme court level was Warranted

Traditionally, the Supreme Court level was warranted in ruling on matters of a rover's weight because issues involving constitutional rights and legal precedent are often at play. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the land and is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and ensuring that laws and regulations are in compliance with it. In cases where fundamental rights are at stake, such as in cases involving privacy or property rights, it is important for the Supreme Court to weigh in and provide a final decision. Additionally, the Supreme Court serves to provide consistency and uniformity in the application of the law across the country. This ensures that legal principles are applied consistently and fairly, regardless of the jurisdiction in which a case arises.