Which evidence best supports the historical claim that the East-West Schism did not begin in 1054 CE, but that mutual excommunication was part of an already growing division? (1 point)
Responses
The decreasing power of the pope following the end of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE conflicted with the rise of Byzantine power in the East
The decreasing power of the pope following the end of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE conflicted with the rise of Byzantine power in the East
The Roman Catholic Church affirmed the ideas of papal supremacy at the First Vatican Council in 1870 CE
The Roman Catholic Church affirmed the ideas of papal supremacy at the First Vatican Council in 1870 CE
Crusaders from Western Europe looted and sacked the city of Constantinople in 1204 CE
Crusaders from Western Europe looted and sacked the city of Constantinople in 1204 CE
The Byzantine Empire rose as a major economic and political power in the western Mediterranean region while Western Europe became more isolated
The Byzantine Empire rose as a major economic and political power in the western Mediterranean region while Western Europe became more isolated
This evidence supports the claim that the East-West Schism did not begin in 1054 CE, but rather that mutual excommunication was part of an already growing division. It shows that the Byzantine Empire was gaining power and influence while Western Europe was becoming more isolated. This suggests that there were already significant differences and tensions between the two regions, which likely contributed to the eventual schism.