Which evidence best supports the historical claim that the East-West Schism did not begin in 1054 CE, but that the mutual excommunication was part of an already growing division?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0ACrusaders from Western Europe looted and sacked the city of Constantinople in 1204 CE.%0D%0ACrusaders from Western Europe looted and sacked the city of Constantinople in 1204 CE.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe decreasing power of the pope following the end of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE conflicted with the rise of Byzantine power in the East.%0D%0AThe decreasing power of the pope following the end of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE conflicted with the rise of Byzantine power in the East.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe Byzantine Empire rose as a major economic and political power in the western Mediterranean region while Western Europe became more isolated.%0D%0AThe Byzantine Empire rose as a major economic and political power in the western Mediterranean region while Western Europe became more isolated.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe Roman Catholic Church affirmed the idea of papal supremacy at the First Vatican Council in 1870 CE.
The evidence that best supports the historical claim that the East-West Schism did not begin in 1054 CE, but that the mutual excommunication was part of an already growing division is:
- The decreasing power of the pope following the end of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE conflicted with the rise of Byzantine power in the East. This suggests that there were tensions and divisions between the Eastern and Western branches of Christianity even before the formal split in 1054 CE.