Which evidence best supports the historical claim that the East-West Schism did not begin in 1054 CE, but that the mutual excommunication was part of an already growing division?(1 point) Responses The Byzantine Empire rose as a major economic and political power in the western Mediterranean region while Western Europe became more isolated. The Byzantine Empire rose as a major economic and political power in the western Mediterranean region while Western Europe became more isolated. The Roman Catholic Church affirmed the idea of papal supremacy at the First Vatican Council in 1870 CE. The Roman Catholic Church affirmed the idea of papal supremacy at the First Vatican Council in 1870 CE. Crusaders from Western Europe looted and sacked the city of Constantinople in 1204 CE. Crusaders from Western Europe looted and sacked the city of Constantinople in 1204 CE. The decreasing power of the pope following the end of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE conflicted with the rise of Byzantine power in the East.
Crusaders from Western Europe looting and sacking the city of Constantinople in 1204 CE best supports the historical claim that the East-West Schism did not begin in 1054 CE. This event demonstrates a deep and growing division between Western Europe and the Byzantine Empire, as Western European forces attacked and plundered the capital of the Byzantine Empire. This act of aggression further deepened the divide between the two regions and contributed to the eventual schism.
