Based on the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, it would be legal for you to wear an armband to school in order to protest an action taken by our government if it did not create a distraction. What is the basis for this?(1 point) Responses protected symbolic speech protected symbolic speech Establishment Clause Establishment Clause freedom to petition freedom to petition freedom to assemble peacefully
The basis for this statement is that the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines established that students have the right to engage in symbolic speech, as long as it does not create a substantial disruption or interfere with the rights of others. The ruling in this case affirmed that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." Therefore, wearing an armband to protest an action taken by the government would be considered protected symbolic speech under the First Amendment, as long as it does not cause a significant distraction or disruption at the school.
shorter
The basis for this statement is the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, which established that students have the right to engage in symbolic speech in schools, as long as it does not disrupt the learning environment or interfere with the rights of others. Wearing an armband to peacefully protest a government action would be considered protected symbolic speech under this ruling.
The basis for wearing an armband to school to protest an action taken by the government, as protected under the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, is the concept of protected symbolic speech. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate."
To get to this answer, one should be familiar with the Tinker v. Des Moines case and its outcome. The case involved a group of students who were suspended for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. The Court ruled in favor of the students, arguing that their actions constituted symbolic speech, which is protected by the First Amendment.
Knowing the specific legal case and its outcomes is essential to understanding why wearing an armband as a form of protest is legally permissible in schools, as long as it does not cause a significant disruption or distraction. Hence, the correct answer would be "protected symbolic speech."