In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, how did the Justices defend the armbands students wore in public school?(1 point)
Responses
The armbands did not interfere with other students’ learning.
The armbands did not interfere with other students’ learning.
The armbands were small enough that no one could see them.
The armbands were small enough that no one could see them.
The armbands looked similar to the students’ uniforms.
The armbands looked similar to the students’ uniforms.
The armbands were only worn by students for 30 minutes a day.
The armbands were a form of expressive speech and did not cause a substantial disruption to the school environment.
In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, the Justices defended the armbands students wore in public school by arguing that the armbands did not interfere with other students' learning. They also argued that the armbands were small enough that no one could see them and that they looked similar to the students' uniforms. Additionally, they mentioned that the armbands were only worn by students for 30 minutes a day.
In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, the Justices defended the armbands students wore in public school by stating that the armbands did not interfere with other students' learning. This was one of the key arguments made in the case.
To find this answer, you can research the Tinker v. Des Moines case and review the arguments presented by both sides. The Supreme Court's decision in this case can also be studied to gain a better understanding of the reasoning behind the Justices' defense of the armbands.