Which of the following best explains why there was confusion over the status of enslaved people in Texas?(1 point) Responses Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other. Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other. Mexican law allowed slavery in a variety of circumstances. Mexican law allowed slavery in a variety of circumstances. Most Anglo-American settlers were in favor of the abolition of slavery, but the government of Mexico was not. Most Anglo-American settlers were in favor of the abolition of slavery, but the government of Mexico was not. There were more free Black people in Texas than enslaved Black people.
The best explanation for the confusion over the status of enslaved people in Texas is that Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other.
Most Anglo-American settlers were in favor of the abolition of slavery, but the government of Mexico was not.
To determine the best explanation for the confusion over the status of enslaved people in Texas, we need to evaluate the given options.
1. Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other.
2. Mexican law allowed slavery in a variety of circumstances.
3. Most Anglo-American settlers were in favor of the abolition of slavery, but the government of Mexico was not.
4. There were more free Black people in Texas than enslaved Black people.
Let's examine each option to find the most suitable explanation:
1. Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other: This option suggests that there was confusion due to conflicting laws and policies regarding the status of enslaved people in Texas. To understand the veracity of this claim, research should be conducted into the specific laws and policies that were in place during the time period in question. Examining historical records and scholarly sources would help to determine if such contradictions existed and influenced the confusion.
2. Mexican law allowed slavery in a variety of circumstances: According to this option, Mexican law permitted slavery in multiple situations. To verify this claim, one would need to consult primary sources, such as legal documents and historical records, to identify the specific circumstances under which slavery was allowed. This would require in-depth research into Mexican legal history and an understanding of the historical context surrounding slavery in Texas.
3. Most Anglo-American settlers were in favor of the abolition of slavery, but the government of Mexico was not: This option suggests that there was a difference in opinion regarding slavery between the Anglo-American settlers and the Mexican government. To validate this claim, one would need to examine historical accounts and primary sources to understand the perspectives of both the settlers and the Mexican government. Analyzing letters, diaries, political speeches, and official documents could provide insight into the sentiments towards slavery held by these groups.
4. There were more free Black people in Texas than enslaved Black people: This option suggests that the confusion arose because there were more free Black individuals than enslaved ones in Texas. To assess this claim, one would need to consult demographic data and historical records to determine the population numbers of free and enslaved Black individuals in the region during that time. Analyzing census records, slave schedules, and other historical documents could shed light on the accuracy of this statement.
By critically evaluating these options and conducting research into historical sources, it is possible to determine which explanation best explains the confusion over the status of enslaved people in Texas.