Below is an excerpt from an informational essay that a student wrote.
Based on a recent study, school lunches have been shown to be an important factor for students in schools. Students that eat a healthy lunch perform better on high stakes tests and are reportedly healthier and happier. Furthermore, good nutrition is important for children in the developmental process. So really, it's pretty obvious how important it is to make school lunches number one!
Which of the following is the best way to revise the underlined sentence for appropriate language while maintaining the same meaning?
A.
Really, it is pretty obvious how badly we need to do something with lunches.
B.
In conclusion, it is important that schools prioritize nutrition in order to maximize the benefits to children.
C.
We need to do something, because obviously we need better lunches badly.
D.
Students perform better at a statistically significant level when they are provided with something to eat.
B.
In conclusion, it is important that schools prioritize nutrition in order to maximize the benefits to children.
B. In conclusion, it is important that schools prioritize nutrition in order to maximize the benefits to children.
To identify the best way to revise the underlined sentence for appropriate language while maintaining the same meaning, let's analyze the options provided:
Option A: "Really, it is pretty obvious how badly we need to do something with lunches."
This option changes the tone of the sentence, using casual language ("pretty obvious" and "badly") that may not be appropriate for an informational essay. Additionally, the phrase "do something with lunches" is vague and lacks specificity.
Option B: "In conclusion, it is important that schools prioritize nutrition in order to maximize the benefits to children."
This option offers a clearer and more formal alternative. By using the phrase "in conclusion," it introduces the idea of summarizing the argument made so far. It also maintains the meaning of the original sentence by stating the importance of prioritizing nutrition in schools.
Option C: "We need to do something, because obviously we need better lunches badly."
Similar to Option A, this option retains casual language ("we need better lunches badly"), which may not be suitable for an informational essay.
Option D: "Students perform better at a statistically significant level when they are provided with something to eat."
This option provides a different perspective, focusing more on the correlation between student performance and having something to eat. Although it doesn't explicitly mention school lunches, it conveys the same idea that nourishment positively affects student outcomes. However, it slightly deviates from the original sentence structure and may not maintain the same emphasis on the importance of school lunches.
Considering the above analysis, Option B appears to be the most appropriate choice. It maintains the same meaning while offering a more formal and concise alternative.