make list for & aganist proposal to increase amount of aid canada give to countries developing
for:
help improve conditions of poor
childrens education
decrease poverty
against:
no guarantee if aid be helpful
it may be used for military and to support dictatorship
these all i get what else i adds?
Those are good.
You might add:
For:
It's the right thing to do.
Providing aid to possible future trading partners may help Canada in the long run.
Against:
Canada should help its own poor people first.
Canadians already pay high taxes.
thanks very much ms. sue :)
You're very welcome, Mohammad.
Here are some additional points you can consider for both the for and against sides of the proposal to increase the amount of aid Canada gives to developing countries:
For:
1. Strengthening diplomatic relations: Increased aid can lead to stronger relationships with developing countries, promoting goodwill and cooperation on various fronts such as trade, security, and diplomacy.
2. Economic benefits: Aid can stimulate economic growth in developing countries, creating new markets for Canadian goods and services, which can ultimately benefit the Canadian economy.
3. Conflict prevention: By addressing the root causes of poverty and inequality, increased aid can contribute to creating more stable and peaceful societies, reducing the likelihood of conflicts and the associated costs for international peacekeeping.
4. Global stability: Assistance to developing countries can contribute to addressing global challenges such as climate change, infectious diseases, and other transnational issues that ultimately affect the safety and well-being of all nations.
Against:
1. Dependency: Providing increased aid can perpetuate a culture of dependency, where developing countries become reliant on external assistance rather than finding sustainable solutions to their challenges.
2. Corruption and mismanagement: There is a risk that increased aid can be misused or wasted due to corruption and inefficiency in recipient countries, instead of reaching its intended beneficiaries.
3. Prioritization of domestic needs: Critics argue that increasing aid might divert resources away from pressing domestic issues and priorities within Canada, such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
4. Market distortion: Excessive aid can artificially distort local markets in developing countries, leading to a decline in local industries and inhibiting long-term economic growth.