How could things have been done differently with this two articles
first article - "Forward or backward looking? The Treaty of Versailles"
Second - Article - "Was the Treaty of Versailles a Victory for Democracy?"
1. In the first article, the perspective could have been balanced by including opinions from both sides of the argument regarding whether the Treaty of Versailles was forward or backward looking. This would have provided a more comprehensive analysis for readers.
2. In the second article, the focus could have been shifted to examining how the Treaty of Versailles impacted democracy in different countries, rather than simply stating whether it was a victory or not. This would have provided a more nuanced understanding of the treaty's effects on democratic principles.