How were the causes and effects of the constitutional monarchy system in England similar to and different from those of the absolute monarchy systems in France, Spain, and Russia?(1 point) Responses Both systems were a response to the need for centralized power, but constitutional monarchy limited the monarch's power Both systems were a response to the need for centralized power, but constitutional monarchy limited the monarch's power Constitutional monarchy was based on divine right, while absolute monarchy was based on social contract Constitutional monarchy was based on divine right, while absolute monarchy was based on social contract Absolute monarchies
often led to autocratic rule with little to no checks on the monarch's power, whereas constitutional monarchy allowed for limited government and a system of checks and balances. In France, Spain, and Russia, absolute monarchs often faced resistance from nobles and the general population, leading to revolutions and upheaval. In contrast, the constitutional monarchy system in England allowed for a more stable government and a gradual expansion of civil liberties and rights for its citizens. Overall, while all systems aimed to centralize power, the effects of constitutional monarchy were more moderate and stable compared to the more extreme consequences of absolute monarchy.
