Which of the following develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision?(1 point) Responses Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches. By deferring to the decisions and actions of the other branches of government, the Court upheld the principle of judicial restraint and avoided overstepping its bounds. This allowed for the separate but equal doctrine to stand, as the Court did not interfere with the laws enacted by the legislative branch.
