Which of the following develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision?(1 point)
Responses
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine.
The correct response is:
"Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches."
To determine which response develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court's Plessy v. Ferguson decision, let's break down the explanations provided.
1. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine.
This response suggests that judicial restraint, which refers to the judicial branch's tendency to limit its own power and defer to the other branches of government, supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because it invalidated the separate but equal doctrine. It implies that the Court showed restraint by not overruling the legislative or executive branches' decision.
2. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches.
This response argues that judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because it challenged the actions of both the legislative and judicial branches. It implies that the Court demonstrated restraint by questioning and examining the actions of the other branches without overstepping its authority.
3. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.
This response asserts that judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches. It suggests that by not interfering with the other branches' actions, the Court exercised restraint.
4. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.
This response proposes that judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause. It implies that the Court showed restraint by critically examining the legislative intent while rendering its decision.
Based on the provided explanations, the first response (Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine) and the fourth response (Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause) both develop logical arguments about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court's Plessy v. Ferguson decision.