Which statement best assesses how Supreme Court decisions have impacted freedom of the press?(1 point)
Responses
Supreme Court decisions have determined that prior restraint is unconstitutional.
Supreme Court decisions have determined that prior restraint is unconstitutional.
Supreme Court decisions have failed to make consistent decisions regarding freedom of the press.
Supreme Court decisions have failed to make consistent decisions regarding freedom of the press.
Supreme Court decisions have consistently limited freedom of the press.
Supreme Court decisions have consistently limited freedom of the press.
Supreme Court decisions have consistently protected and expanded the freedom of the press.
1. Supreme Court decisions have consistently protected an expanded the freedom of the press.
2. New York Times v. Sullivan determined that actual malice must be proven to pursue changes of libel in the case of a public official.
3. It’s at the standard for what it meant for government to violate the establishment clause.
4. To protect other members of society.
5. A person breaks a policy of their employer to participate in a religious ceremony
Sorry if any words are off I used to voice to text
Supreme Court decisions have consistently protected and expanded the freedom of the press.
Supreme Court decisions have consistently protected and expanded the freedom of the press.
The correct response would be:
Supreme Court decisions have consistently protected and expanded the freedom of the press.
To assess how Supreme Court decisions have impacted freedom of the press, one would need to study and analyze the various decisions made by the Supreme Court over time. This involves looking at the specific cases and determining if the Court's rulings have generally resulted in the protection and expansion of freedom of the press or if they have consistently limited it. This requires a thorough examination of key decisions and the reasoning behind them.
To research and understand the impact of Supreme Court decisions on freedom of the press, one can start by reviewing landmark cases that have shaped this area of law. Some notable cases include New York Times Co. v. United States (1971), which affirmed the freedom of the press against prior restraint, and Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), which expanded the rights of corporations to engage in political speech. By examining these cases, as well as others, one can gain a better understanding of the Court's stance on freedom of the press and its impact on this fundamental right.
It's important to note that the Court's decisions may vary in different contexts and over time, and opinions about the impact of these decisions can differ. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate a range of opinions and legal analyses to form a well-rounded understanding of the topic.