Analyze the quote:
"Comic books should never be considered canon for they lack depth. Books are latent with in-depth lore and consistent detail while comic books are romanticized fan-fiction trying to over-inflate events that transpire in canonology of the origin point; that being books.
Heed my warning: if you ever find yourself enraged by the portrayal in cinematic versions of your favorite fictional book, look no further than comic books to blame. Certainly I agree that even books can be shredded upon examination and transformation into cinema, but most if not all directors and screenwriters look towards comic-books for relation to actions held within books. And these actions more often that not do not coincide with the writers original vision and departmentalize the foundations of the fiction.
Agree or not, comic books are a stain on good writing and should not be looked for in canon or potential media portrayal. They are disgusting heaps of bad ideas glued together with shame."
This quote expresses a strong opinion that comic books should not be considered canon because they lack depth and are essentially romanticized fan-fiction. The speaker argues that books, with their in-depth lore and consistent detail, are the true origin point of canon and should be the only source of reference for any adaptations, including cinematic versions.
The speaker warns that if fans are unhappy with the portrayal of their favorite books in movies, they should blame comic books for distorting the original vision of the author. The speaker believes that directors and screenwriters often turn to comic books for inspiration, even though they do not accurately portray the writer's original vision.
Overall, the quote suggests a disdain for comic books and their impact on the portrayal of literature in other media. The speaker views comic books as a stain on good writing and argues that they should not be considered canon or used as a basis for potential media adaptations.