Agree/Disagree — No man has any natural authority over his fellow men.
why?
This is a subjective question and different individuals may have differing opinions. However, I can provide you with some arguments for both agreement and disagreement:
Agree:
1. Equality: Some people believe in the inherent equality of all individuals, asserting that no one has a natural authority over another. They argue that authority should only be bestowed based on competence, skills, or consensus.
2. Individual rights: Supporters of this view argue that every person possesses fundamental rights and freedoms, and no one person should have authority over others in a way that infringes upon these rights.
3. Social contract theory: According to this theory, individuals give up certain liberties to form a society governed by laws. In this context, no natural authority is inherent but is instead granted by consent of the governed.
Disagree:
1. Hierarchical structures: Many societies are built upon hierarchical systems where individuals hold authority over others based on different factors such as age, expertise, or leadership roles.
2. Parental authority: Parents often have natural authority over their children, responsible for their care, guidance, and well-being until they reach a certain age or level of responsibility.
3. Authority through expertise: In some instances, an individual with superior knowledge, skills, experience, or qualifications can naturally have authority over others in specific domains, such as a teacher or coach.
It is important to note that views on natural authority can vary based on cultural, societal, and philosophical perspectives.