Which of the following would support newtons third law of motion one a bumper car travels west and hits another bumper car that is moving to a bumper car hits another bumper car with 100 N of force three a bump car hits another bumpy car that is not moving with 300 N of force For a bumper car back up traveling north and hit another bump that is moving
Newton's third law of motion states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. This means that when one object exerts a force on another object, the second object exerts an equal and opposite force on the first object.
In the given scenarios, the following situations would support Newton's third law:
1. When a bumper car travels west and hits another bumper car that is moving: The first bumper car exerts a force on the second bumper car, and the second bumper car exerts an equal and opposite force on the first bumper car. This demonstrates the action-reaction pair of forces.
2. When a bumper car hits another bumper car with 100 N of force: In this case, the force exerted by the first bumper car is 100 N, and in accordance with Newton's third law, the second bumper car would exert an equal and opposite force of 100 N on the first bumper car.
3. For a bumper car to back up and hit another bumper car traveling north: It is not explicitly mentioned in the question, but assuming the second bumper car is traveling south, when the first bumper car hits the second bumper car, an equal and opposite force would be exerted on both cars, satisfying Newton's third law.
It is important to note that the given information does not include specific velocities or masses of the bumper cars, which would be necessary for a more detailed analysis of the forces involved.