Which of the following best explains why the influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights has lessened in recent decades?(1 point)

Responses

The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.
The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.

People no longer want to use the U.S. Constitution because so many countries were not successful in keeping the constitutions they developed.
People no longer want to use the U.S. Constitution because so many countries were not successful in keeping the constitutions they developed.

Many countries have tried democracy but found it did not work for them, causing them to give up on the American model.
Many countries have tried democracy but found it did not work for them, causing them to give up on the American model.

The practices of separation of powers, checks and balances, and judicial review are no longer seen as useful.

The U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights are no longer seen as relevant or applicable to contemporary issues.

one of the options i gave you

Apologies for misunderstanding. The option "The practices of separation of powers, checks and balances, and judicial review are no longer seen as useful" best explains why the influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights has lessened in recent decades.