Which of the following best explains why the influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights has lessened in recent decades?(1 point)
Responses
Many countries have tried democracy but found it did not work for them, causing them to give up on the American model.
The practices of separation of powers, checks and balances, and judicial review are no longer seen as useful.
The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.
People no longer want to use the U.S. Constitution because so many countries were not successful in keeping the constitutions they developed.
The option that best explains why the influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights has lessened in recent decades is:
The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.
To come to this conclusion, one should consider the historical context and changing societal norms. The U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights were groundbreaking documents when they were written, establishing a framework for democracy and protecting individual rights. However, as time has passed, other countries and international organizations have developed their own human rights documents that may be more comprehensive and encompassing of evolving social issues. These newer rights documents may address a wider range of concerns and provide more specific protections than the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. As a result, some individuals may perceive the U.S. Constitution as limited or outdated in comparison and may look to other sources for guidance on human rights and governance. It is important to note that this explanation does not imply that the U.S. Constitution is inherently flawed or ineffective; rather, it highlights the potential perception of its limitations in comparison to newer rights documents.