resource is used for the application. Determine the pros and cons of their usage.
Write a report or to share your research and explain why you
I think one resource is better suited for the application you chose.
Name
Appearance
Hardness
Luster
Magnetism
Cleavage/Fracture
Other Notes
Use
bituminous coal and anthracite
Name: Bituminous Coal and Anthracite
Appearance: Both bituminous coal and anthracite have a black, shiny appearance. However, bituminous coal may have a layered structure, while anthracite is known for its homogenous texture.
Hardness: Bituminous coal has a lower hardness compared to anthracite. It ranks around 2-2.5 on the Mohs scale of hardness, while anthracite ranks at around 2.2-2.8.
Luster: Bituminous coal has a dull to shiny luster, while anthracite has a high, metallic luster.
Magnetism: Neither bituminous coal nor anthracite exhibit any magnetism.
Cleavage/Fracture: Bituminous coal exhibits a conchoidal fracture, meaning it breaks into smooth, curved surfaces. Anthracite, however, has a poorly developed fracture and tends to break with an irregular or uneven pattern.
Other Notes: Bituminous coal is formed from the carbonization of plant debris, under pressure and heat over a long period of time. It is widely used as a fuel for power generation and in industrial applications. On the other hand, anthracite is a high-grade coal known for its low sulfur content and high carbon content. It is primarily used for heating purposes due to its high energy and heat output.
Pros and Cons:
1. Bituminous Coal:
Pros:
- Abundant and widely available
- Relatively inexpensive compared to other energy sources
- Versatile fuel used in power generation, cement production, and steel manufacturing
- Can be easily transported and stored
Cons:
- High carbon dioxide emission when burned, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change
- Generates air pollutants, including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter when burned, leading to air pollution and associated health issues
- Mining bituminous coal can have significant environmental and health impacts, such as land degradation, water pollution, and respiratory diseases for miners
2. Anthracite:
Pros:
- High carbon content, making it a highly efficient and clean-burning fuel
- Low sulfur content, contributing to reduced emissions of sulfur dioxide and acid rain formation
- High energy density, providing more heat per unit compared to other coals
- Long burn time and steady heat output, making it ideal for heating purposes
Cons:
- Limited availability and higher cost compared to other types of coal
- Requires specialized equipment for combustion due to its high density and low ignition temperature
- Mining anthracite can be challenging and costly due to its underground occurrence and difficult extraction methods
- While it emits fewer pollutants compared to other coals, its combustion still releases greenhouse gases and contributes to climate change
Based on the analysis, if the application requires a highly efficient and clean-burning fuel with low emissions, anthracite would be the better choice. However, if the cost, availability, and versatility of use are decisive factors, bituminous coal might be more suitable. It is essential to consider the specific requirements, environmental impact, and economic feasibility when choosing the appropriate coal resource for an application.