resource is used for the application. Determine the pros and cons of their usage.
Write a report or create a presentation to share your research and explain why you
I think one resource is better suited for the application you chose.
Name
Appearance
Hardness
Luster
Magnetism
Cleavage/Fracture
Other Notes
Use
bituminous coal and anthracite
Pros of using bituminous coal as a resource in the chosen application:
1. Abundance: Bituminous coal is widely available and is one of the most plentiful energy resources on Earth.
2. High energy content: It has a high carbon content and a high energy value, making it a suitable choice for applications requiring a large amount of heat or energy.
3. Versatile: Bituminous coal can be used for various purposes, such as electricity generation, metallurgical processes, and manufacturing of coal-tar products.
4. Relatively low cost: Bituminous coal is generally more affordable compared to other energy sources like oil or natural gas.
Cons of using bituminous coal as a resource in the chosen application:
1. Environmental impact: Burning bituminous coal releases significant amounts of carbon dioxide and other air pollutants, contributing to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
2. Non-renewable: Bituminous coal is a fossil fuel and its reserves are finite. Its usage contributes to the depletion of natural resources.
3. Health hazards: Mining and utilizing bituminous coal can have detrimental effects on the health of workers, due to exposure to coal dust and hazardous gases.
4. Transportation and storage: Coal transport and storage require special infrastructure and can pose logistical challenges.
Anthracite is a type of coal that possesses several distinct advantages and disadvantages compared to bituminous coal:
Pros of using anthracite as a resource in the chosen application:
1. High energy content: Anthracite coal has the highest carbon content among coal types, resulting in a higher energy value and cleaner combustion.
2. Low sulfur content: Anthracite coal has low sulfur emissions, which reduces air pollution compared to bituminous coal.
3. Longer burning time: Anthracite coal has a slower burn rate and can provide a sustained heat output over a longer duration compared to bituminous coal.
4. Versatile applications: Anthracite coal can be used for residential heating, industrial processes, and as a component in the production of steel.
Cons of using anthracite as a resource in the chosen application:
1. Limited availability: Anthracite coal reserves are more limited compared to bituminous coal, making it less accessible and potentially more expensive.
2. Difficulty in ignition: Anthracite coal has a higher ignition temperature, requiring a higher heat source to start its combustion process.
3. Less suitable for certain applications: Due to its slow burn rate, anthracite coal may not be suitable for applications that require quick heat, such as in power plants or steam generation.
4. Environmental concerns: Although anthracite coal has lower sulfur content, combustion still results in carbon dioxide emissions and contributes to climate change.
Based on these pros and cons, it can be concluded that for certain applications where clean combustion and longer burn time are crucial, anthracite coal may be a better choice. However, for applications requiring affordability, versatility, and abundance, bituminous coal may be more suitable. Considerations such as environmental impact and resource availability should also be taken into account when making a decision.