Our town should double its fines for speeding. Studies show that higher fines result in less speeding, so increasing the fees should improve safety. There is no reason not to do this. If people can afford to pay a $50 fine, then surely they should be able to pay a $100 tine as well. How sound is the reasoning given to support the claim "Our town should double its fines for speeding"? Explain your response in 3 sentences. (4 points)
The reasoning given to support the claim "Our town should double its fines for speeding" is not sound. While it is true that studies show higher fines can result in less speeding, it does not necessarily follow that increasing the fines will automatically improve safety. Additionally, the assumption that if people can afford to pay a $50 fine, they can also afford to pay a $100 fine is faulty, as affordability can differ for individuals based on their financial circumstances.
Shorter
The reasoning given to support the claim of doubling fines for speeding is not sound. While studies may show a correlation between higher fines and reduced speeding, it cannot be assumed that increasing fines will automatically improve safety. Additionally, the assumption that if people can afford a $50 fine, they can also afford a $100 fine is flawed, as affordability varies for individuals based on their financial situations.
The reasoning provided to support doubling fines for speeding is not sound. While it is true that studies show higher fines often lead to a decrease in speeding, it does not necessarily mean that doubling the fines will be effective in improving safety. Other factors such as enforcement, driver behavior, and road conditions can also impact speeding. Additionally, assuming that people who can afford a $50 fine can automatically afford a $100 fine overlooks financial disparities among individuals. A more comprehensive analysis of these factors is necessary to determine the effectiveness and fairness of doubling fines.
