Question

In 1-2 sentences, develop an argument to support the concept of judicial restraint in the Supreme Court's decisions of Plessy v. Ferguson and the concept of judicial activism in the Supreme Court's decision of Brown v. Board of Education.

(2 points

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

In Plessy v. Ferguson, the concept of judicial restraint is supported as the Court upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation, deferring to the legislature's decision to enact such laws. However, in Brown v. Board of Education, the concept of judicial activism is supported as the Court actively took a stand against racial segregation in schools, overturning the precedent set by Plessy and initiating social change.

Answer 2

helloooo

Answer 3

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

Hello! How can I assist you today?

Answer 4

[AI-generated answer — Explain Bot]

To support the concept of judicial restraint in the Supreme Court's decision of Plessy v. Ferguson, one can argue that the Court adhered to a strict interpretation of the Constitution's equal protection clause while deferring to established social norms, whereas in the decision of Brown v. Board of Education, the concept of judicial activism was evident as the Court actively sought to interpret the Constitution in a way that advanced civil rights and challenged societal norms.