Judicial Restraint vs Judicial Activism

Welcome to the "Judicial Restraint vs Judicial Activism" category on Questions LLC! This category is designed to provide you with a deep understanding of the ongoing debate between judicial restraint and judicial activism. Judicial restraint refers to a judicial philosophy in which judges exercise self-restraint and strictly interpret the law as written, leaving policy decisions to elected legislators. On the other hand, judicial activism promotes judges actively shaping policy through their interpretation of the law to achieve desired social or political outcomes. As you explore this category, you will find a collection of insightful questions and discussions that shed light on the strengths, weaknesses, and implications of these two approaches. Whether you are a law student, a legal professional, or simply an avid learner interested in the intricacies of our justice system, we invite you to delve into the nuanced world of judicial restraint and judicial activism.