The question of when judicial activism is warranted by the Supreme Court is subjective and can vary depending on individual perspectives. However, one point of view suggests that judicial activism may be warranted when there is a need to interpret the Constitution in light of changing societal values or emerging issues that were not contemplated by the framers. Judicial activism may also be warranted when certain laws or government actions are believed to infringe upon fundamental rights protected by the Constitution. Ultimately, this is a complex and debated issue, and opinions may differ based on one's interpretation of the Constitution and the role of the judiciary.
