Compromises related to keeping the balance when admitting new states to the union and slavery:

___________________________: Missouri- slave, Maine- free
choices
Sedition Act
Missouri Compromise

Compromise of 1850

Kansas-Nebraska Act
Dred Scott Decision
________________________________
The Compromise of 1820, also known as the Missouri Compromise, was a significant compromise related to maintaining the balance between free and slave states. This compromise allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state, while Maine was admitted as a free state, thus maintaining the balance between the two factions. Additionally, the compromise established a line dividing the Louisiana Purchase into northern and southern regions, with slavery prohibited north of this line. This compromise was aimed at preserving the delicate equilibrium between free and slave states in the Union.

The Compromise of 1850 was another compromise that attempted to address the issue of admitting new states to the Union while also dealing with the issue of slavery. This compromise allowed California to enter the Union as a free state, but also enacted the Fugitive Slave Act, which required Northern states to return escaped slaves to their owners in the South. The compromise also opened up the territories of New Mexico and Utah to popular sovereignty, meaning that the residents of these territories would vote to determine if they would be admitted as free or slave states. This compromise further highlighted the divide between the North and South over the issue of slavery.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was another compromise that aimed to address the issue of admitting new states to the Union while also addressing the issue of slavery. This act repealed the Missouri Compromise and allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves if they would allow slavery through popular sovereignty. This compromise resulted in violence and conflict between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in Kansas, further deepening the divide between the North and South.

The Dred Scott Decision of 1857 was a controversial Supreme Court ruling that declared that slaves were property and not citizens, and therefore couldn't sue for their freedom. This decision further heightened tensions between the North and South and played a role in the lead-up to the Civil War.

These compromises reflect the ongoing struggle to maintain the balance between free and slave states while admitting new states to the Union. However, it is important to note that these compromises ultimately failed to address the underlying issues surrounding slavery and instead served to exacerbate the growing divisions between the North and South, ultimately leading to the American Civil War.

is it a or b

I apologize, but I'm unable to answer your question as it seems incomplete. Could you please provide more context or clarify your question?

The compromise related to keeping the balance when admitting new states to the union and addressing the issue of slavery is known as the Missouri Compromise. Let me explain how this compromise came about and what it entailed.

During the early 19th century, the United States was expanding westward, and the question of whether new states would be free or allow slavery became increasingly contentious. In 1819, the territory of Missouri applied for statehood with a constitution that permitted slavery. At the time, there were equal numbers of free and slave states in the union, and admitting Missouri as a slave state would upset this balance.

To address this issue, a compromise was proposed in 1820 by Henry Clay, a prominent American statesman. The Missouri Compromise had two key components. Firstly, it admitted Missouri as a slave state. However, to maintain the balance, another state would need to be admitted as a free state. Thus, Maine, which was part of Massachusetts, was separated and admitted to the union as a free state.

The second important element of the compromise was the establishment of a geographic boundary that would determine whether future states could allow slavery. It was agreed that slavery would be prohibited in any territories in the Louisiana Purchase north of the 36°30′ parallel (the southern boundary of Missouri). This meant that when new states were formed or admitted from those territories, they would be free states.

This compromise was considered successful at the time, as it maintained the balance of power between free and slave states. It was also seen as a way to prevent the issue of slavery from plunging the country into a potential crisis or civil war. However, it ultimately proved to be a temporary solution, as tensions over slavery continued to escalate and ultimately led to the American Civil War in 1861.

So, to summarize, the Missouri Compromise was a compromise designed to maintain a balance between free and slave states when admitting new states to the union. It admitted Missouri as a slave state but also admitted Maine as a free state, and it established a boundary line to determine future states' stance on slavery.