Compromises related to keeping the balance when admitting new states to the union and slavery:
___________________________: Missouri- slave, Maine- free
Compromise of 1850: Utah & New Mexico- popular sovereignty, California- free; slave trade banned in DC
Kansas-Nebraska Act: gave popular sovereignty to all new states, resulted in violence
Sedition Act
Missouri Compromise
This answer seems to mix up different historical events and compromises. The Sedition Act, for example, was a law passed in 1798 that restricted freedom of speech and press in the United States. It is not directly related to admitting new states to the union or slavery compromises.
The Missouri Compromise, on the other hand, is a correct example of a compromise related to the admission of new states and slavery. It was an agreement reached in 1820 to keep the balance of power between slave and free states. Under this compromise, Missouri was admitted as a slave state, while Maine was admitted as a free state. It also established a line, known as the 36°30' parallel, where slavery would be prohibited in any future states admitted from the Louisiana Purchase territory north of that line.
Another significant compromise related to slavery and the admission of new states was the Compromise of 1850. This compromise included a series of measures aimed at maintaining the balance between free and slave states. It admitted California as a free state, prohibited the slave trade in Washington, D.C., and implemented popular sovereignty in Utah and New Mexico territories to determine if they would allow slavery or not.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act, passed in 1854, is another compromise related to the admission of new states and slavery. It repealed the Missouri Compromise and allowed popular sovereignty in the Kansas and Nebraska territories. This led to violent conflicts between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers in Kansas, known as "Bleeding Kansas."
To summarize, the correct compromises related to keeping the balance when admitting new states to the union and slavery are the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
fill in the blank
Sedition Act
Missouri Compromise
I apologize for the confusion. The Sedition Act and the Missouri Compromise are not directly related to the balance when admitting new states to the union and slavery compromises.
However, another important compromise related to slavery and the admission of new states is the 1820 Missouri Compromise. This compromise involved allowing Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state while admitting Maine as a free state. This compromise also established a line, known as the 36°30' parallel, where slavery would be prohibited in any future states formed from the Louisiana Purchase territory north of the line.
The compromises mentioned in your question are related to the admission of new states to the United States and the issue of slavery. Here is an explanation of each compromise and its significance:
1. Missouri Compromise:
The Missouri Compromise was reached in 1820 as an attempt to maintain a balance of power between the slave states and free states. Under this compromise, Missouri was admitted to the Union as a slave state, while Maine was admitted as a free state. Additionally, it established a line, known as the 36°30’ parallel, where slavery would be prohibited in all future territories north of that line. This compromise was an effort to prevent further disputes over the expansion of slavery into newly acquired territories.
2. Compromise of 1850:
The Compromise of 1850 was a series of measures aimed at resolving conflicts between free and slave states. One of its key provisions was the admission of California as a free state. It also allowed the territories of Utah and New Mexico to determine their status on slavery through popular sovereignty, meaning that the residents of these territories would decide for themselves if they wanted to allow slavery or not. Additionally, the Compromise of 1850 included a ban on the slave trade in Washington, D.C. This compromise aimed to maintain peace in the United States by addressing the territorial expansion of slavery.
3. Kansas-Nebraska Act:
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise by allowing popular sovereignty in determining the status of slavery in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska. This act gave the residents of these territories the right to decide whether they wanted to allow slavery or not. However, this decision resulted in significant violence and conflict between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers in Kansas, which contributed to the escalation of tension between the North and the South leading up to the Civil War.
It's important to note that compromises like these were temporary solutions to the deep-rooted issue of slavery in the United States. They demonstrated the ongoing struggle to maintain a balance between the interests of free states and slave states, but ultimately failed to prevent the eventual eruption of the Civil War.