In The Call of the Wild, would this new theory have worked for Buck? Why or why not? (Use examples from the novel as support.) In today's society, the theory that I think is more effective is the "Survival of the kindness" by Dr. Kukk. Dr. Kukk's article "Survival of the Fittest Has Evolved: Try Survival of the Kindest" shows how today's society benefits more from being compassionate towards people gets them a lot further than trying to fight for survival and worrying about oneself. Being compassionate towards others helps people have more of a "village" than them just being alone. " Those communities which included the greatest number of the most sympathetic members would flourish best," was stated by Darwin. Survival of the kindness can not only help others but also ensures that you get help as well. Where survival of the fittest can make someone seem selfish and not seem like they care about anyone else.
In The Call of the Wild, this new theory of "Survival of the Kindness" proposed by Dr. Kukk may not have worked for Buck. The novel explores the harsh realities of the wilderness and the survival instincts necessary for survival in such an environment.
Buck, the protagonist, undergoes a transformation from a domesticated dog to a wild and instinctual creature. He learns to adapt and survive in the brutal conditions he is forced into. Throughout the novel, Buck faces numerous challenges where the survival of the fittest mentality is paramount.
For example, when Buck becomes a member of a dog team, he experiences intense competition and must fight his way to assert his dominance. In these situations, displaying kindness or compassion towards his fellow dogs would not have been advantageous for his own survival. Instead, Buck relies on his physical strength and cunningness to establish his position in the pack.
Furthermore, the novel emphasizes the brutality and the law of the club in the wild. It demonstrates that only the strongest and most dominant survive. The harshness of the environment demands a focus on self-preservation rather than kindness. The portrayal of the sled dogs, who often resort to violence to establish dominance, reflects this survival of the fittest mentality.
Therefore, in the context of The Call of the Wild, Dr. Kukk's theory of "Survival of the Kindness" would not have worked for Buck. His survival relies on his ability to adapt, compete, and assert dominance in a merciless wilderness. The novel emphasizes the importance of individual strength and self-preservation, making Buck's journey incompatible with the principles of compassion and kindness.
In The Call of the Wild, the new theory of "Survival of the kindness" proposed by Dr. Kukk might not have worked for Buck.
The novel revolves around the concept of the "survival of the fittest," where Buck's journey reflects his adaptation to the harsh and brutal environment. Buck's transformation from a domesticated dog to a wild, primitive creature is driven by the instinct to survive. Throughout the story, Buck faces numerous challenges that require him to tap into his primal instincts and fight for his own survival. For instance, he must learn to fight other dogs, endure harsh weather conditions, and compete for dominance within the pack.
The "survival of the kindness" theory emphasizes compassion and cooperation rather than individualism and competition. While this theory may be more applicable in today's society, it does not align with the circumstances Buck faces in the novel. The dog's survival depends on his ability to assert dominance, secure his place within the pack, and protect himself against adversaries. Compassion alone would not have been sufficient for Buck to navigate the harsh realities of the wild.
Additionally, Buck's journey in the novel demonstrates that the law of the wild is governed by primal instincts rather than kindness and compassion. He encounters characters like Spitz, a ruthless and dominant sled dog, who represents the embodiment of survival of the fittest. Spitz's aggressive behavior and ability to manipulate the pack hierarchy provide a stark contrast to the idea of survival through kindness.
In conclusion, while the theory of "Survival of the kindness" by Dr. Kukk may hold relevance in today's society, it would not have worked for Buck in The Call of the Wild. The novel emphasizes the notion of survival driven by primal instincts and navigating a brutal environment where compassion alone would not have secured Buck's survival.
To determine whether the theory of "Survival of the kindness" would have worked for Buck in The Call of the Wild, we need to analyze how this theory aligns with the events and themes in the novel.
In The Call of the Wild, Buck is a domesticated dog living a comfortable life in California until he is stolen and sold into a brutal life as a sled dog in the Yukon during the gold rush. Throughout the novel, Buck faces numerous challenges and must adapt to the harsh realities of the wilderness.
While the theory of "Survival of the kindness" promotes compassion and cooperation, it is important to recognize that the novel predominantly portrays a world governed by the principle of "Survival of the fittest." In this harsh environment, Buck's survival and success depend on his ability to assert dominance, adapt to the demands of the wild, and secure his own well-being.
For example, early in the novel, Buck learns the law of Club and Fang, where he witnesses the ruthless hierarchy among the sled dogs and realizes that he must fight and assert his dominance to survive. This aspect reflects the "Survival of the fittest" concept, which emphasizes individual strength and competition.
Furthermore, Buck's encounters with other dogs and humans, such as his rivalry with the aggressive Spitz and his interaction with John Thornton, also demonstrate the significance of strength and self-reliance in the wilderness. Buck's survival and ultimate transformation into a wild animal capable of leading a wolf pack are driven by his ability to adapt and thrive in this brutal environment.
While the concept of "Survival of the kindness" may have positive societal implications, it is difficult to argue that it would have directly benefited Buck in the context of The Call of the Wild. Buck's journey is one of physical and psychological transformation, where he must tap into his primal instincts and survive in an unforgiving wilderness.
It is worth noting that the novel does emphasize some elements of compassion, loyalty, and community, particularly in Buck's deep bond with John Thornton. However, these aspects are more nuanced and often arise as a result of survival rather than as the leading principle for success.
In conclusion, while the theory of "Survival of the kindness" may have value in modern society, it would not have directly benefited Buck in the harsh and brutal world depicted in The Call of the Wild. Buck's journey reflects the dominance of the "Survival of the fittest" concept, where individual strength, adaptation, and self-preservation are crucial for survival.