A student claims that hitting a tennis ball across the court is an example of balanced forces. Is he correct?(1 point)
Responses
No, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.
No, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.
Yes, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides.
Yes, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides.
No, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides.
No, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides.
Yes, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.
No, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.
No, because the force in the direction of the ball's motion is greater.
The correct response is: No, because the force in the direction of the ball's motion is greater.
To understand why this is the correct answer, let's break down the concept of balanced forces. Balanced forces occur when the net force acting on an object is zero, meaning that all the forces acting on the object cancel each other out. In this case, if the student claims that hitting a tennis ball across the court is an example of balanced forces, we need to consider the forces at play.
When hitting a tennis ball, there are two main forces acting on the ball: the force applied by the player's racket and the force of air resistance. The force applied by the player's racket is in the direction of the ball's motion. This force propels the ball forward and helps it travel across the court. On the other hand, air resistance acts opposite to the ball's motion, slowing it down.
In this scenario, the force in the direction of the ball's motion (force applied by the racket) is greater than the force of air resistance. Therefore, the forces are not balanced. Consequently, the student's claim that hitting a tennis ball across the court is an example of balanced forces is incorrect, and the correct answer is "No, because the force in the direction of the ball's motion is greater."