in a paragraph analyze the great compromise during the constitutional convention. what problem did it solve? what were the alternatives?
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a pivotal agreement reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. This compromise solved the critical problem of representation in the newly formed United States. The main issue at hand was the disagreement between large and small states regarding the unfairness of representation in the legislative branch. The larger states argued that representation should be based on population size, while the smaller states advocated for equal representation for all states. To address this, the Great Compromise proposed a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives based on population and the Senate granting equal representation to each state. This compromise successfully balanced the interests of both large and small states, ensuring that no state would be overly dominant. Alternatives to this compromise included having either one chamber based on population or two equal chambers representing each state. However, neither of these alternatives would have satisfied both factions, leading to prolonged disagreements and potentially undermining the formation of a strong, united government. Thus, the Great Compromise proved crucial in creating a fair and functioning system of representation in the United States.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a key moment during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It aimed to address the heated debate over representation in the newly formed United States government. The problem it solved was finding a balance between the large and small states' interests and ensuring equal representation for all.
The alternatives to the Great Compromise were the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan proposed a bicameral legislature with representation based on population, which favored larger states. On the other hand, the New Jersey Plan suggested a unicameral legislature with equal representation for all states, which favored smaller states.
The Great Compromise, proposed by Roger Sherman of Connecticut, combined aspects of both plans. It led to the establishment of a bicameral legislature. In the Senate, each state would have an equal number of representatives, providing smaller states with an equal voice. In the House of Representatives, representation would be based on population, allowing larger states to have more influence. This compromise struck a balance between the interests of both large and small states and ensured a fair representation system for all, thus playing a crucial role in the creation of the Constitution.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a crucial agreement reached during the Constitutional Convention in 1787 to resolve a fundamental problem regarding the structure of the legislative branch. The problem arose from the conflicting interests and concerns of the delegates from smaller states and larger states. The smaller states, fearing that their voices would be drowned out by the larger states in a national legislature based on population, supported the New Jersey Plan. This plan proposed equal representation for each state. On the other hand, the larger states, such as Virginia, advocated for the Virginia Plan, which proposed proportional representation based on population.
The Great Compromise was proposed by Roger Sherman of Connecticut and it reconciled these two opposing viewpoints. It consisted of two main components. Firstly, it established a bicameral legislature, consisting of two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Secondly, it determined the composition of each house. The Senate would provide equal representation for each state, with two senators per state, regardless of population. This satisfied the smaller states' demand for equal power in the legislature. In contrast, the House of Representatives would have proportional representation, with the number of seats allocated to each state determined by its population. This accommodated the larger states' concern for their influence in proportion to their population.
The Great Compromise emerged as a successful solution, as it struck a balance between the competing interests and preserved the integrity of both the smaller and larger states. It ultimately solved the problem of how to structure a national legislature, effectively addressing both representation concerns. Without the Great Compromise, it would have been challenging to obtain consensus and draft a constitution that all states could support, which would likely have hindered the establishment of a strong and lasting federal government.