In the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, how did the process of judicial review allow the Supreme Court to decide on the case?(1 point) Responses The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the rule of law protected individuals from segregation in schools. The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the rule of law protected individuals from segregation in schools. The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional. The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional. The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, stating that in education they are allowed to segregate. The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, stating that in education they are allowed to segregate. The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, citing the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.

The correct response is: The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.

The process of judicial review allowed the Supreme Court to decide on the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka by evaluating whether the segregation of schools based on race was constitutional or not. In this case, the Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, stating that separate but equal is unconstitutional.

To understand how the process of judicial review allowed the Court to make this decision, it is important to understand what judicial review is. Judicial review is the power of the courts to review the actions of the legislative and executive branches of government, and to determine whether those actions are in compliance with the constitution.

In the case of Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court reviewed the practice of segregating schools based on race and evaluated whether it violated the Constitution, specifically the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment includes the equal protection clause, which states that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction equal protection under the law.

To come to a decision, the Court had to consider legal arguments presented by both the plaintiff and the defendant, as well as examine relevant constitutional provisions, precedents, and legal principles. They analyzed the impact of segregation on the rights of individuals and the principles of equality and fairness.

Based on their analysis, the Court concluded that separate but equal educational facilities for different races are inherently unequal and violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This ruling was a significant step in the desegregation of public schools and a landmark decision in the fight against racial discrimination.