A student claims that hitting a tennis ball across the court is an example of balanced forces. Is he correct?(1 point) Responses No, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides. No, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides. No, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater. No, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater. Yes, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater. Yes, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater. Yes, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides. Yes, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides.
No, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.
The correct response is: No, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.
The correct answer is: No, because the force in the direction of the ball's motion is greater.
To explain why this is the correct answer, we need to understand the concept of balanced forces. Balanced forces occur when the forces acting on an object are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, resulting in no overall change in motion.
In the case of hitting a tennis ball across the court, the player exerts a force on the ball to make it move. However, there are other forces acting on the ball as well, such as air resistance, gravity, and friction. These additional forces are not equal in magnitude or opposite in direction to the force exerted by the player.
In particular, the force in the direction of the ball's motion is greater than the forces opposing it. This is because the player must overcome the air resistance and friction to make the ball move. If the forces were balanced, the ball would not experience any acceleration and would not be able to move across the court.
Therefore, the student is incorrect in claiming that hitting a tennis ball across the court is an example of balanced forces.