A student claims that hitting a tennis ball across the court is an example of balanced forces. Is he correct?(1 point) Responses Yes, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides. Yes, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides. No, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides. No, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides. Yes, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater. Yes, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater. No, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is great
No, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.
The correct response is "Yes, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides."
To understand why hitting a tennis ball across the court is an example of balanced forces, we need to explain the concept of balanced forces. Balanced forces occur when the forces applied to an object are equal in size and opposite in direction, resulting in no change in the object's motion.
In the case of hitting a tennis ball, when you strike the ball with your racket, you are exerting a force on it. At the same time, the ball exerts an equal and opposite force back on the racket, according to Newton's third law of motion. These two forces cancel each other out, leading to a balanced force system.
It's important to note that hitting the ball in one direction does not mean there is an imbalance of forces. The forces acting on the ball from all sides, including the force in the direction of the ball's motion, are balanced because they are equal and opposite.
Therefore, the student is correct in claiming that hitting a tennis ball across the court is an example of balanced forces.
The correct response is:
No, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides.