Which of the following statements shows one way historians would assess the effect of José Gutiérrez de Lara’s actions on the Mexican War for Independence?(1 point)

Responses

His heroism and leadership were a turning point for Mexican independence.
His heroism and leadership were a turning point for Mexican independence.

He successfully unified rebels against Spain and helped win the Battle of Medina.
He successfully unified rebels against Spain and helped win the Battle of Medina.

Divisions between him and other Texas leaders caused rebels to lose the Battle of Medina.
Divisions between him and other Texas leaders caused rebels to lose the Battle of Medina.

By acting as a spy for Spain, he destroyed attempts for Mexican independence.

His heroism and leadership were a turning point for Mexican independence.

He successfully unified rebels against Spain and helped win the Battle of Medina.

The statement that shows one way historians would assess the effect of José Gutiérrez de Lara's actions on the Mexican War for Independence is: "He successfully unified rebels against Spain and helped win the Battle of Medina."

To assess the effect of José Gutiérrez de Lara's actions on the Mexican War for Independence, historians would analyze the various statements and consider the evidence provided.

Statement 1: "His heroism and leadership were a turning point for Mexican independence."
This statement suggests that José Gutiérrez de Lara's actions had a significant positive impact on Mexican independence. Historians would evaluate the evidence supporting his heroism and leadership, such as his contributions to key battles or his role in uniting rebels.

Statement 2: "He successfully unified rebels against Spain and helped win the Battle of Medina."
This statement indicates that José Gutiérrez de Lara played a successful role in unifying rebels against Spain and achieving victory in the Battle of Medina. To assess this statement, historians would examine historical records to verify the claimed unification and participation in the battle.

Statement 3: "Divisions between him and other Texas leaders caused rebels to lose the Battle of Medina."
This statement suggests that José Gutiérrez de Lara's divisions with other Texas leaders resulted in the rebels' defeat in the Battle of Medina. Historians would investigate the historical context, including conflicts between leaders and their impact on military operations, to assess the validity of this statement.

Statement 4: "By acting as a spy for Spain, he destroyed attempts for Mexican independence."
This statement implies that José Gutiérrez de Lara's actions as a spy for Spain hindered or undermined efforts for Mexican independence. Historians would examine credible sources and historical evidence to determine whether there is verifiable proof of his collaboration with Spain.

In summary, historians would assess the effect of José Gutiérrez de Lara's actions on the Mexican War for Independence by analyzing the evidence and evaluating the credibility of each statement. They would consider factors such as his heroism, leadership, unification of rebels, divisions with other leaders, and any potential collaboration with Spain.