Which of the following best describes the downfall of Greek

city-states? (1 point)
prolonged war
food desert
urban penalty
urban blight

prolonged war

To determine which of the options best describes the downfall of Greek city-states, let's break down each option and analyze it:

1. Prolonged war: This refers to a long-lasting conflict that could have had significant consequences for Greek city-states. This option suggests that ongoing warfare might have played a role in their downfall.

2. Food desert: A food desert is an area where access to fresh and nutritious food is limited. However, this term is typically associated with urban areas, and Greek city-states were not typically characterized by such limited access to food.

3. Urban penalty: This option is not a well-known term used to describe the downfall of Greek city-states. It is not commonly associated with this historical context.

4. Urban blight: Urban blight refers to the deterioration, decay, and decline of buildings, infrastructure, and overall quality of life in urban areas. While this could have been a factor contributing to the downfall of Greek city-states, it might not capture the entire picture.

Considering these options, the most plausible choice for the downfall of Greek city-states is prolonged war. However, it's important to note that the decline of the Greek city-states was a complex process influenced by various factors, including economic, political, and social changes. Hence, the downfall cannot be solely attributed to one factor alone.

In summary, the best option that describes the downfall of Greek city-states is prolonged war, although other factors likely also played a role.

The best answer that describes the downfall of Greek city-states is prolonged war. The city-states of ancient Greece often engaged in conflicts with each other and external powers, leading to prolonged periods of warfare. These wars weakened and drained the resources of the city-states, ultimately contributing to their downfall.