Category 4: Evaluate the Overall Effectiveness/Impact of each speech (2 +2 = 4) + (2 +2= 4) = (8 marks)
Speech 1:"i see something". Dananjaya Hettiarachchi Speech 2: "the power of words".Mohammed Qahtani
Category 3: Overall Effectiveness/Impact of Each Address (20 marks)
Most Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
Most Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
Least Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
Least Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
Category 5: The Delivery – Body Language and Voice (20 marks)
Compare the two speakers in terms of speech delivery (use of body language and voice).
You must write two paragraphs (1.5 line spacing in Arial font).
Length of paragraph: not shorter than 250 words and no longer than 300 words.
• Your paragraphs should not be written in bullet form. Write topic sentences, support sentences and closing sentences.
• Important: You must not discuss one speaker in paragraph one and then the next speaker in paragraph two. You need to synthesise your comparisons in both paragraphs.
Consider the following aspects before you write your response:
• Which speaker is more effective and why?
• Overall effective use of voice and body language - motivate your answer.
• Is there anything you would criticise regarding the use of the speakers’ voice?
• What impression do you get from each speaker based on their dress code and general appearance, their voice, and use of body language?
In comparing the delivery of Speech 1 by Dananjaya Hettiarachchi and Speech 2 by Mohammed Qahtani, it is clear that both speakers are highly effective in their use of body language and voice.
One of the most appealing aspects of Hettiarachchi's delivery is his use of gestures and facial expressions. Throughout his speech, he employs a variety of hand movements to emphasize his points and engage the audience. For example, when he discusses the struggles he faced in his life, he uses dramatic gestures to convey the intensity of his emotions. This not only adds depth and sincerity to his speech but also creates a visual impact that captures the audience's attention. Additionally, Hettiarachchi's facial expressions are expressive and reflective of the emotions he is conveying in his speech. This adds authenticity and helps to establish a connection with the audience.
Similarly, Qahtani also utilizes body language effectively in his speech. He has a calm and composed demeanor, which gives him an air of confidence and authority. Qahtani's use of hand movements is more subtle compared to Hettiarachchi, but equally impactful. He uses small gestures to emphasize key points and maintain engagement with the audience. Furthermore, Qahtani's use of eye contact is noteworthy. He maintains steady eye contact with the audience throughout his speech, which helps to establish trust and credibility.
Both speakers also demonstrate an effective use of voice. Hettiarachchi's voice is powerful and passionate, capturing the listeners' attention and conveying his emotions effectively. He varies his tone and pitch to emphasize key points, creating a dynamic and engaging delivery. On the other hand, Qahtani's voice is calm and controlled. His measured and deliberate speech gives his words weight and significance, leaving a lasting impact on the audience.
In terms of appearance, Hettiarachchi appears confident and well-groomed. He dresses in a professional manner, wearing a suit which adds to his credibility as a speaker. Qahtani also appears professional, wearing a traditional Middle Eastern attire. His choice of clothing reflects his cultural background and adds authenticity to his speech.
Overall, both Hettiarachchi and Qahtani are highly effective speakers in terms of their use of body language and voice. While Hettiarachchi's gestures and facial expressions add a visual impact to his delivery, Qahtani excels in maintaining a calm and composed demeanor and establishing trust through his eye contact. In terms of voice, Hettiarachchi's passionate delivery captures the audience's attention, while Qahtani's measured speech leaves a lasting impact. Both speakers' appearance reflects their professionalism and adds to their credibility.
To evaluate the overall effectiveness/impact of each speech and compare the speakers in terms of speech delivery (body language and voice), follow these steps:
Step 1: Watch or listen to both speeches multiple times.
To properly evaluate the overall effectiveness and impact of each speech, it is crucial to watch or listen to them multiple times to fully grasp the content and analyze the delivery.
Step 2: Identify the most appealing aspects and reasons.
In each speech, identify the aspects that stood out and appealed to you the most. Consider factors such as content, storytelling, emotional appeal, use of rhetorical devices, and connection with the audience. Support your choices with specific examples from the speeches.
Step 3: Identify the least appealing aspects and reasons.
Similarly, identify the aspects that you found least appealing in each speech. This could include weak arguments, lack of conviction, ineffective delivery, or any other aspects that failed to make an impact. Again, provide specific examples to back up your viewpoint.
Step 4: Analyze the delivery – body language and voice.
When comparing the speakers in terms of speech delivery, focus on their use of body language and voice. Assess how effectively they used gestures, facial expressions, posture, and movement to convey their message. Analyze their vocal variety, tone, pace, and clarity in order to determine their impact on the audience.
Step 5: Write two paragraphs synthesizing your comparisons.
In writing your response, ensure that you do not discuss one speaker in one paragraph and the next speaker in the next paragraph. Instead, synthesize your comparisons in both paragraphs. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence that introduces the main point. Then, provide support sentences that analyze and provide specific examples to justify your assessment. Finally, close each paragraph with a summary or concluding statement.
Step 6: Include critiques and impressions.
When discussing the effectiveness of the speakers' voice, consider whether there was anything you would criticize in terms of their vocal delivery. Additionally, analyze the dress code, general appearance, and overall impression each speaker made based on their voice and body language.
By following these steps, you should be able to evaluate the overall effectiveness and impact of each speech and compare the speakers in terms of their speech delivery using body language and voice.
Paragraph 1:
Both Dananjaya Hettiarachchi and Mohammed Qahtani delivered powerful speeches, but in terms of overall effectiveness, Hettiarachchi's speech stood out. Hettiarachchi's use of body language and voice was particularly captivating. Throughout his speech, he exuded confidence and passion, utilizing purposeful hand gestures and facial expressions to emphasize key points. His body language conveyed a sense of conviction and authenticity, grabbing the audience's attention and keeping them engaged. In addition, Hettiarachchi's voice was clear, resonant, and well-modulated, effectively conveying his emotions and ensuring that his message was easily understood. His vocal variety and dynamic delivery added depth and impact to his words, leaving a lasting impression on the audience.
Paragraph 2:
While Qahtani delivered an impactful speech, his use of body language and voice was not as effective as Hettiarachchi's. Qahtani's body language appeared more restrained and less expressive compared to Hettiarachchi. Although he utilized some gestures, they were not as purposeful or connected to his message. Additionally, Qahtani's voice, while clear and audible, lacked the vocal variety and dynamic range displayed by Hettiarachchi. This made his delivery somewhat monotonous, diminishing the overall impact of his speech. Furthermore, Qahtani's dress code and general appearance did not add much to his overall impression. While he was neat and professional in his attire, it did not convey a strong sense of personality or capture the audience's attention in the same way Hettiarachchi's presence did.
In conclusion, when considering the overall delivery of both speakers, Dananjaya Hettiarachchi's utilization of body language and voice was more effective and impactful. His confident demeanor and purposeful gestures, combined with his clear and resonant voice, created a powerful and memorable delivery. On the other hand, Mohammed Qahtani's delivery, while still commendable, lacked the same level of expressiveness and vocal variation. However, it's important to note that the effectiveness of a speech goes beyond just the delivery and includes other factors such as content and the connection with the audience.